As with every living thing, there are times of growth and
maturing. So it is with the current state of the Hebraic
Roots/Messianic Movement. While the Messianic Movement may
trace its roots to the first century C.E., it has not truly
begun to sprout until recently. Lying almost dormant for
centuries, the seed of this Movement has been germinating
just below the surface. Recently, however, the Movement
has experienced a rapid period of growth. By all accounts,
this modern Movement is still in its infancy. I'm not sure
when the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement officially began,
but I do know that in the last 25-30 years it has experienced
a phenomenal period of growth, not only in North America,
but also in South America, and even in the land of Israel.
This type of rapid growth can only be attributed to the
Ruach Hachodesh! With such rapid growth, we should not be
surprised to experience major growing pains. Such is the
case with the recent controversy over which calendar those
in the Messianic Movement should be following.
There are two primary candidates in the running to be the
Calendar of the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement. The incumbent
candidate is the Rabbinic calendar used by the majority
of Judaism, and the majority of the current Hebraic Roots/Messianic
Movement. This calendar was created by Hillel 2 in 359 C.E.
for the Jews in Diaspora. The calendar was based upon mathematical
calculations of the rotation of the sun and moon for the
meridian of Jerusalem. In this way, the Jews could keep
track of their calendar as best as possible while living
outside the land of Israel. For sixteen hundred years the
Jews have been living by this calendar all over the world.
This calendar has surely been a unifying factor within Judaism.
As the Hebrew Roots/Messianic Movement has sought to establish
itself as a legitimate, though grafted in, branch of the
tree of the Nation of Israel, the calendar has played a
significant role. By keeping the Sabbath, celebrating the
feasts, following the weekly Torah portions, and observing
the Rabbinic calendar, the Hebrew Roots/Messianic Movement
has displayed a sincere desire to reconcile itself with
its brothers and sisters in Judaism. From the start of the
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement, there has been an underlying
willingness to establish an identity and secure a place
in the Nation of Israel by adopting all things Jewish, including
the Rabbinic calendar.
On the other side of the calendar debate is our second
candidate, the Biblical calendar. Like the Messianic Movement
itself, this calendar has its roots planted deep in antiquity,
and yet it too, is for all intents and purposes, new upon
the scene. Now that a part of the nation of Israel is back
in The Land of Israel, there is a desire to return to the
proper Biblical calendar. This calendar is based, not upon
the mathematical calculations of the Rabbis, but upon the
cycle of the moon and sun, as well as the state of the flax
and barely. This calendar is based upon the words of the
Torah itself. While this Biblical calendar is clearly used
by the minority both within Judaism and the Hebraic Roots/Messianic
Movement, there is a growing desire for scriptural integrity
within these groups that draws people to this new candidate
for Calendar of the Movement. As many Church members discover
the pagan, man made traditions that influenced the Christian
Church, causing it to forsake the Torah and its Hebraic
Roots, they seek to come out of "Babylon" to become fellow
citizens in the common wealth of Israel. These new citizens
have a zeal for studying the Torah and learning the truth.
Not wanting to be deceived again, these newly liberated
brethren are seeking to live according to the commandments
of Hashem, not the doctrines of men. It is not long, however,
before these new citizens realize that Judaism, like Christianity,
is also shaped by "the traditions of the elders". Thus,
what is practiced in Rabbinic Judaism is not necessarily
any more consistent with the Torah than what was found and
rejected in Christianity. As the Ruach Hachodesh inscribes
the Torah upon the hearts of these new believers, there
is a growing desire to live according to the Word, instead
of man's traditions. For many, when the Torah states that
the New Year is to begin in the month when the barely is
aviv, it makes sense to celebrate Rosh Hashanah in Nissan
(the first month), rather than in Tishrei (the seventh month).
It also makes sense to inspect the barley, instead of religiously
following the Rabbis calculations. This is especially true
when the calculations of the Rabbis are clearly contradicted
by the physical evidence of the barley and the new moon.
So, we are witnessing a growing group of supporters for
the underdog Biblical calendar. But with it, we are also
experiencing the pains of a growing division within the
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement.
Before a choice for a calendar is made there is another
pertinent question at the heart of the controversy that
must be addressed. I believe that the calendar controversy
presently confronting the Movement is simply a symptom of
a greater debate yet to be addressed. The central and fundamental
debate is over the issue of authority. The true question
being asked by the members of this infant movement is not
which calendar is right, but what authority do we follow.
Clearly the authority behind the Rabbinic calendar is the
Rabbis. The Rabbis have established their authority through
the writings of the Talmud, the Oral Torah. It is the Talmud
that has established the Rabbinic calendar as the calendar
for all Israel, including those in the Diaspora. On the
other hand, the authority behind the Biblical calendar is
the written Torah. The tension that is tearing at the unity
of the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement is simply the tension
that exists when the written Torah and the oral Torah do
not agree. The calendar is only one of many such issues.
The real question that is begging to be answered by the
respected leaders of the movement is, which authority does
the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement recognize as normative
for the Movement? Or more plainly said, "What is the place
of, or, what authority does, the Oral Torah have in the
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement?" Much of what currently
shapes the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement is based in
Rabbinic Judaism. The Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement clearly
reflects a trend towards Jewish culture and practices. Present
day Jewish practices are largely derived from the authority
of the Talmudic writings and Rabbis. The problem with the
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement's blind acceptance of the
authority of the Talmud and the rulings of the Rabbis is
the Talmud's rejection of Yashua as the Messiah. If the
Rabbis and the Talmud are to become the authority of the
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement then we must come to terms
with the rejection of Yashua as Messiah, as well as other
objectionable or contrary teachings. Let us look at how
this debate directly impacts the Movement's choice of calendars.
The Scripture teaches that Pesach is on the 14th of Nissan,
the Feast of Matzoth begins on the 15th of Nissan, and that
the First Fruits of the barley harvest are brought on the
day after the weekly Sabbath (Lev. 23:9-11). There is clearly
no numerical date assigned to the day the First Fruits of
the harvest are brought to the temple for a wave offering.
This is because, according to the Biblical calendar, there
are a varying number of days between the Feast of Matzoth
and the weekly Sabbath, which the First Fruits Offering
follows. Why is this pattern important for Messianic Believers
to understand? It is because this pattern is a part of the
evidence that declares Yashua as the Messiah. In the year
28 C.E., the year that Yashua was most likely crucified,
there were exactly three days and three nights between Pesach
and the First Fruits Offering. Thus we see Yashua fulfilling
the prophetic shadow picture evident in the Biblical Calendar.
The Rabbis have altered this shadow picture by assigning
a fixed numerical date to the First Fruits Offering. The
Rabbis have declared First Fruits to be always on the 16th
of Nissan. This minor calendar change radically altars the
picture of Messiah. We should remember that the sign that
Messiah Yashua gave to the Pharisees to authenticate His
identity was the sign of Jonah, declaring that the Son of
man would be three days and three nights in the heart of
the earth (Matthew 12:40). There has been a great deal of
teaching in the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement directed
towards Christians, encouraging them to see the importance
of the shadow pictures of Messiah in the Feasts of the Lord,
while at the same time denouncing the erroneous traditional
Christian teaching of Yashua dying on Friday, and rising
on Sunday. Thus, the same problem exists in both the Christian
calendar and the Rabbinic calendar. Both of these calendars
cloud the Biblical teaching concerning the death and resurrection
of the Messiah. If the Rabbinic and Christian calendars
are correct, that Yashua died on the 14th of Nissan, was
buried on the 15th, and raised on the 16th, then we must
concede that Yashua did not fulfill His own prophetic statement
of being in the heart of the earth three days and three
nights. Alternately, according to the Biblical Calendar,
Yashua would have died on the 14th and risen on the 17th,
thus fulfilling this important sign.
As the Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement grows and matures
it is beginning to establish its own identity. Where once
the Movement was striving to simply be a part of Judaism,
now it is standing on its own, and beginning to recognize
that like Christianity, Judaism also has some repenting
to do, before Israel and Judah can be reconciled. Thus at
least part of the Messianic Movement is beginning to stand
up to its big brother Judah, and say, "we are not simply
going to move from Christianity into Rabbinic Judaism. We
are not going to simply slip from one set of human traditions
to another." This is especially so if these traditions deny
Yashua as Messiah, or contradict the written Torah! So it
is with the issue of the calendar. I believe that the calendar
debate is just a sign of the movement growing up, maturing,
and standing up on its own two feet, even over and against
the influences of its older brother.
I also believe that this current calendar controversy reveals
subtle divisions within the vision or goals of the current
Hebraic Roots/Messianic Movement. There seems to be at present
four different visions driving the Hebraic Roots/Messianic
Movement. First, is what appears to be the original vision
of proving that Jews can believe in Yashua as Messiah and
remain Jews. This vision requires that Jewish believers
in Yashua continue in all of their Jewish practices as much
as possible, even accepting the authority of the Talmud.
This original vision did not do much to encourage Gentile
believers in keeping the Torah. For the most part, the Gentile
believer is encouraged to remain in the Christian Church.
The second vision within the Messianic Movement seems to
have grown out of this first one. This vision is that of
Jews for Jesus, Apple of His Eye Ministry and other such
ministries which seek to "convert" the Jews to faith in
Jesus Christ and bring them into the Church. For these groups
Hebraic culture and customs are simply a means to an end.
This vision is largely driven by Christians who have embraced
Jewish customs as an evangelism tool. The third vision driving
the messianic movement is the Two House teaching. I believe
that the Two House teaching is the major force behind most
of the recent growth and enthusiasm within the Hebraic Roots/Messianic
Movement. The goal of this vision is to help believers recognize
and reconcile the two divided houses of the Nation of Israel,
the House of Israel, and the House of Judah. This vision
is the first to take into serious consideration the large
number of Gentile believers in Yashua coming out of the
Christian Church to embrace the Torah observant lifestyle.
This has lead to the fourth vision within the movement,
which is simply to encourage all believers in Yashua to
lead a Torah observant Life. I want to be quite clear here,
I am not suggesting that these visions are mutually exclusive.
But each of these visions has its own goals, which at times
may and do conflict with each other. For those seeking to
prove that they are still Jewish, or seeking to reconcile
with those within Judaism, keeping the Rabbinic Calendar
plays a very significant role. But for those who are coming
into the movement seeking to learn and observe the teachings
of the written Torah, then following the Biblical calendar
seems the most logical choice.
Are these issues divisive? Yes. But not to the degree that
it will prevent the Movement from its continued growth.
Again, I believe that eventually we will all be keeping
the Biblical calendar. If not before, then when the Messiah
comes. Thus, those in the minority who have been studying,
learning, teaching, and encouraging believers to watch the
barley and look for the new moon, and who have been forcing
us to consider the conflict between the written and the
oral Torah, are not our enemies. Instead these brothers
and sisters are the pioneers who are called of Hashem to
begin the final preparations for life in the Messianic kingdom.
Like any living body, change comes slowly, and rarely uniformly.
Looking at the development of my own children (ages 7, 10,
13, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23), their bodies morph and transform
in very different ways and at varying times. At some point
in their development, baby teeth fall out, feet grow big,
beards grow in, legs get gangly, adult teeth fill in, and
bodies fill out. At various points, various parts are growing
and not always in proportion to the rest of the members.
So it is with the Messianic Movement. We are young. We are
growing. We are feeling the pains of growth. No change in
the body comes quickly, or uniformly. So we should not be
surprised to see some people hold tightly to the Rabbinic
calendar, while at the same time others will be embracing
the Biblical calendar. This change does not mean the end
of the Movement, or even an end to its forward momentum.
Is this current calendar controversy painful, confusing,
and divisive? Yes. Sorting out these kinds of issues is
never easy. It is not easy to establish our place and identity
within the Nation of Israel when we have not yet determined
who we are among ourselves. But it seems to me that if the
Biblical calendar is in fact Biblical, then it is what the
Ruach Hachodesh is writing in the believers' hearts. Again,
if this is so, then we shall see more and more of the movement
beginning to embrace this minority candidate for Calendar
of the Movement. If it is not the work of the Ruach Hachodesh,
then eventually this too will be exposed and the second
option for the Calendar of the Movement will fade away.
In the mean time, we should extend grace to each other.
None of us have all the answers, or the full revelation.
We need each other. Each of us has been called and gifted
for a purpose. Therefore, it is important that we recognize
and respect the headship of each family, each fellowship,
and each Ministry. If I choose to follow the Rabbinic calendar
with my family, so be it. If my brother chooses to follow
the Biblical calendar, so be it. If our fellowship as a
whole decides to follow one calendar or the other, so be
it. While we may celebrate at different times, we will each
be held accountable for what has been revealed to us. We
can only act in what we have understanding of. Therefore,
as Hashem gives me understanding, so I do. But if I gain
understanding before my brother does, it is not for me to
judge my brother, but to pray for him and share with him
what I have learned. As Messianic believers we should be
clear to proclaim that our unity is in Messiah, not in our
piety, or even our calendar. Therefore we may disagree on
various issues of understanding, but we are still united
in Messiah. Whether we follow one calendar or the other
we are still brothers and sisters in Messiah. I do not believe,
therefore, that this division over the calendar is divisive
enough to end the Movement. I believe that grace can in
fact overcome this division. Eventually, from the pains
of this controversy, questions will be answered, prayers
will be answered, knowledge, wisdom, and understanding will
be gained, and visions will be clarified. In all, I believe
that this controversy will strengthen the movement in the
long run. So, which ever candidate for Calendar of the Movement
you vote for in this debate, show grace to those who disagree
with you, and pray that Hashem will indeed shepherd His
fold to common ground, to common knowledge, to common understanding,
and to common sense. In the mean time, let us grant grace
to each other to follow our conscience before Hashem, recognizing
that each of us has been imbued with the knowledge, understanding,
and wisdom necessary to accomplish the purposes for which
Hashem has called us. What is certain in this Movement is
that in 10-20 years from now we will not be where we are today. Hashem is stirring in the hearts of His people. The
Ruach HaChodesh is revealing and writing Torah on the hearts
of His people. Yashua is the "Good Shepherd". I have every
confidence that He will guide us safely through this present
controversy into greener